Re: [ba-ohs-talk] What are we trying to accomplish?
Paul Fernhout wrote: (01)
> ...the focus seems more on a great system to evolve populations of
> textual content, as opposed to a great framework for the evolution of
> populations of code.... (02)
Excellent insight. (03)
> That self-reflective aspect of the system isn't emphasized, such as it
> is with, say, Squeak Smalltalk (for all its other issues) or, say, Forth
> (the premier Bootstrapping computer language in some ways). (04)
Ah! A fellow Forth hacker. Should have known.
:_) (05)
(On the other hand, SmallTalk completely baffled me...) (06)