[ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: [integrate] Was Pauli right? Colloquium on Integrative Study
>From: "Joseph Engelberg" <engelber@earthlink.net>
>
>Was Pauli right?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
>"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
>
>
>
>Though we now have natural sciences,
>
>we no longer have a total scientific picture of the world.
>
>
>
>Since the discovery of the quantum of action,
>
>physics has gradually been forced to relinquish its proud claim
>
>to be able to understand, in principle, the whole world.
>
>
>
>This very circumstance, however, as a correction of earlier one-sidedness,
>
>could contain the germ of progress toward a unified conception of the
>entire cosmos
>
>of which the natural sciences are only a part.
>
>
>
>Nobel Laureate (theoretical physics) W. Pauli
>
>in C. G. Jung and W. Pauli, The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche
>(Bollingen Series, LI), New York, l955,
>
>p.147(see p.209). (01)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2. (02)
NexistWiki
http://www.nexist.org/wiki/ (03)