Joe,
Great work on defining "knowledge." Your comments on initial complexity of
transcoding ideas proposed by Jack, Lee and Eric on May 11, is timely.
If you or anyone is passing through the City tomorrow, would like to catch a
ride to the meeting at SRI.
Thanks.
Rod.
.
altintdev@webtv.net wrote:
> With the ;working' definition of knowldege being developed at
> www.hypermultimedia.com/DKR/model2.htm your reference to venka-f makes
> me want to list some characteristics of the Knowledge category like
> this:
>
> 1. The Knowldege appears to be related to understanding and interpreting
> one or more DKR Goal or Problem. To the best of their ability,
> colaborators agree that each Knowledge item will actually advance the
> DKR purpose.
>
> 2. Collaborators agree that the Knowledge is 'correct'. Evolution of the
> Knowledge item involving arguments for and against its validity can be
> followed and evaluated.
>
> 3. This Knowledge forms the basis for defining an action taken to win
> the Goal or solve the Problem. This is the exhibition of Wisdom.
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Joe
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 17 2000 - 12:27:20 PDT