I was perusing some links on the Wiki sight of Denham Grey
(http://www.voght.com/cgi-bin/pywiki?DenhamGrey). Denham recently asked some
questions on the Bootstrap Wiki site. I believe Joe may have followed up
with him. Denham also created his own page on the Bootstrap Wiki site. But
from Denham's own Wiki site, I went to his KMIntro page
(http://www.voght.com/cgi-bin/pywiki?KmIntro).
Denham's KMIntro page recommended this "Intro to Knowledge Management" site
(http://www.uts.edu.au/fac/hss/Departments/DIS/km/introduct.htm).
This led me to an article discussing the philosophical infrastructure of KM
(http://www.brint.com/km/km.htm). The author, Yogesh Malhotra, contends that
Lockean (consensual) and Leibnizian (closed) inquiry systems are less well
suited for KM than Kantian (multiple complementary views) and Hegelian
(multiple antithetical views) inquiry systems.
While this isn't of great interest to me, I am passing it along to those who
might be interested in following up on Mary Keeler's discussion a few weeks
ago.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/444287/_/961016518/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 14 2000 - 14:10:17 PDT