It's a sign of the fact that the terms have never
been defined, I think, that I have never conceived
of the OHS as a toolset, while you clearly have.
I have always seen the OHS as some sort of repository.
That is not necessarily the most ideal or the most
useful vision -- its just the one I have always had.
You, on the other hand, have a very different vision,
that appears to be based on documents I am unfamiliar
with. At least, I don't recall seeing anything that
described things in that way.
Apparently, you are of a school that sees the OHS
as thing that looks into the DKR? I've heard others
talking in that fashion, but have never understood
that particular view of things.
I agree that consistent terminology is necessary.
At Tuesday's meeting, we consistently referred to
the OHS as though it were a repository with a
functional interface, and no one seemed to be
adverse to that label.
I think the design makes sense, regardless of what
we label the components, but I agree that consistent
labeling is desirable.
Your turn...
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Create your business web site your way now at Bigstep.com.
It's the fast, easy way to get online, to promote your business,
and to sell your products and services. Try Bigstep.com now.
http://click.egroups.com/1/9183/2/_/444287/_/974334616/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 16:40:48 PST