David Kankiewicz wrote:
> P.S. Some how, you've made me convince myself that it has to be
> created,
> no matter what the cost... Hmm, I'm still thinking...
Super discussion David. I wish we had the kind of collaboration tool
we've been
envisioning to carry it on, IBIS-style. I feel like we have a common
goal -- to
arrive at, or predict the arrival of, some kind of system that "works",
and we're
both struggling with a series of obstacles, alternatives, and
implications that we're
trying to make sense of.
In my contracting, I've found that the majority of weeks, I work 32
hours. That
gives me enough time to be productive, and leavs time for things I'm
interested
in. I usually do that in 5 days. (I'd rather work 4 days, but cutting
back to 24
hour weeks would be financial suicide, and I find I just can't sustain
any
consistent level of productivity for 8 hours.)
I suspect the transition will involve cutting down work weeks like that
-- but
that transition assumes a big enough wage that its feasible.
As a walked away earlier, I was thinking about your major premise --
that
over time, fewer people will needed to do things we need them for now.
I buy that premise. Even though I am less sanguine about how far or fast
that trend proceed, I suspect it is inevitable -- barring a comet,
running out
of energy, running short of food, etc.
That thought produces *two* interesting paths for the future:
1) We render lots of people obsolete, by virtue of automation and
knowledge-based systems.
2) We press the reset button, and wind up having to rebuild
civilization
after a long, dark age.
Each of those scenarios has a strong probability. The status quo appears
to me to be the lowest probablity future in the bunch.
However, to return to your point -- what DO we do as we transition from
a human-powered civilization to an increasingly machine-driven
civilization
that takes advantage of automated knowledge systems?
How will that transition play out? At first, we'll see increasing
unemployment,
but it won't be so severe that it causes alarm. Later that number will
rise.
If we're on the ball, we'll probably enact social legislation to reduce
work
weeks, etc, so that we can keep consumers in enough coin to keep the
economy moving -- otherwise, it could fall down for lack of people to
spend money!
Eventaully, we may well work our way down to 2 hour days. I hope
so. I wonder how much suffering will occur as a result of the lag
between our step-wise transition to that level, and the unemployment
that precedes each step?
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/IHFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 21:43:55 PDT