Re: *MLs come later?

From: Eugene Eric Kim (eekim@eekim.com)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 20:30:50 PST

Next message: John J. Deneen: "Re: defining what we mean by "collaboration""
Previous message: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
In reply to: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Next in thread: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Reply: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, N. C a r r o l l wrote:

> Gack indeed. Anyway I think *MLs are getting
> premature attention. From Doug and most folks who
> are looking at the lower levels, tables seems to be
> the consensus.

I don't understand what you mean by this.

-Eugene

-- 
+=== Eugene Eric Kim ===== eekim@eekim.com ===== http://www.eekim.com/ ===+
|       "Writer's block is a fancy term made up by whiners so they        |
+=====  can have an excuse to drink alcohol."  --Steve Martin  ===========+

Next message: John J. Deneen: "Re: defining what we mean by "collaboration""
Previous message: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
In reply to: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Next in thread: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Reply: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:01 PDT