This is good. Groves Rock! (to borrow from Eric).
What you have just described is an ontology with universal addressing
From: Eugene Eric Kim <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, N. C a r r o l l wrote:
> > Spoke to Lee today, and he made an observation that
> > clarified my view of an OHS. He referred to the lower
> > levels of the OHS as simply a "dynamic repository,"
> > or if you will a "dynamic object repository" -- with
> > the "knowledge" being created as the objects are
> > brought up from the repository.
> I'll throw in another twist, which will be further explicated in my tech
> notes (to be posted in the next few days, hopefully). I think that the
> underlying structure for these global DKRs will be defined primarily by
> the link databases. In other words, typed links that can link from
> literally any type of document to any other type of document provide the
> necessary and sufficient level of structure to do interesting things with
> these knowledge repositories (e.g. infer knowledge, maintain more useful
> associations, etc.) without forcing us to adopt some sort of universal
> document type (i.e. the so-called "I-file.").
> If you believe this, I would also argue that the most important elements
> of the OHS are the link database and a metalanguage for defining document
> data models (such as SGML groves property sets).
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not
the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies
of the message and its attachments and notify email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:01 PDT