(just quickly, without having time to read through the articles Jack has
pointed to...)
www.uia.org is just overflowing with interesting stuff!
take
http://www.uia.org/uiademo/met/chingndx.htm
It isn't really clear why they've done that until you go here
http://www.uia.org/uiademo/met/houses.htm
clicking on a link in the second one takes you back to a row in the first.
If you then click on a link in a row you get the description for that row
according to its column type.
What's interesting is adding it all up gives you a purely *qualitative*
meta-ontological descriptive hypernet on the subject of dialogues and their
purposes.
I wonder what would happen if you could take a given dialogue and subsume it
under that hypernet statistically?
Would it give you a way to measure motivations, biases and so forth?
I suppose that might be its original purpose.
cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Park" <jackpark@thinkalong.com>
To: <unrev-II@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "jeff Conklin" <jeff.conklin@verizon.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: [unrev-II] Dialog Mapping and email
> Based on a post by Heiner Benking to OHS-DEV, I discovered a paper at
> http://www.uia.org/uiadocs/dialqual.htm
> Enhancing the Quality of Email Dialog using Artificial Intelligence.
>
> I found that paper (it's the top listing) at
> http://www.uia.org/uiadocs/aadocdia.htm which is a listing of papers and
> reports on dialog and community.
>
> That URL came from the paper Dialog Culture which was found at
> http://www.ceptualinstitute.com/genre/benking/dialogue-culture.htm, the
> first paragraph of which is:
>
> "When looking at Dialogue and David Bohm's work that discusses going
beyond
> assumptions, isolation and interest, and towards an open sharing of ideas,
> we learn that people increasingly get together only to present their own
> ideas and to defend their views or projects. Bohm was very aware of the
> need -- even in open and free (no format) meetings -- to find procedures
or
> principles that will literally give people the "space" to talk and
> especially to overcome ingrained habits and convictions which tend to bias
> and hamper speakers (for more see: On Dialogue p 30). He was very aware of
> how 'talkers' use words, protecting themselves by building walls of words
> therefore mis-intentionally hindering the free flow of ideas that could
> otherwise reinforce and encourage a participatory mode and mood. "
>
> It appears that one could spend several weeks motoring around in the space
> opened by Benking while comparing and contrasting all that to Jeff
> Conklin's IBIS papers.
>
> Cheers
> Jack
>
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:09:40 PDT