[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Indexes: Main | Date | Thread | Author

oops, RE: Another such tool: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Mind mapping tool

I should learn to read my inbox from the bottom! I see that Al has already 
shed enough light on this possibility.    (01)

As far as I remember, there has been talk of Mifflin, the Java engine used 
by Compendium, going open source. Maybe Al could shed some light on the 
status of that effort.    (02)

At 04:36 AM 10/29/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>The web site tells you everything except how much it costs and how to get
>it. Any time I see this sort of thing, I assume that it is going to cost a
>*lot* more than I am willing to pay. Plus, it annoys me not to be able to
>get some idea of price.
>Garold (Gary) L. Johnson
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
>[mailto:owner-ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org]On Behalf Of
>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:08 AM
>To: ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
>Subject: RE: Another such tool: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Mind mapping tool
>In addition to the tools Danny mentions, Compendium
>(www.compendiuminstitute.org) has all the desired characteristics -- XML,
>RDF, and Jabber-friendly, represents nodes in multiple views (in fact it
>takes that quite far), etc.
>"Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>@bootstrap.org on 10/29/2002 05:14:05
>Please respond to ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
>Sent by:    owner-ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
>To:    <ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org>
>Subject:    RE: Another such tool: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Mind mapping tool
> >Thanks. I read about something called "Grokker" last
> >night, too. Any word on that?
> >
> >Alex Shapiro wrote:
> >
> >> Here is some more info about Groxis
> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/technology/27SOFT.html
> >> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/10/27/192225.shtml?tid=95
> >>
> >> So far I haven't found any info to impress me.  It seems that all they
> >> it take cluster suggestions such as those returned by www.vivismo.com
> >> form a hierarchical map out of them.  The problem with hierarchical
> >> is that they don't give you a sense of how an item could fall
> >into multiple
> >> categories.  This same data could have been rendered using Inxight's
> >> tree.
>Or for that matter with TouchGraph  (as Alex modestly neglects to mention)
>I agree with Alex's point about the limitations of hierachical views, and
>it's a common drawback to virtually all the 'mindmapper' type tools,
>whatever their subject matter. For such tools to become *really* useful, in
>my opinion they will need to have at least two fundamental characteristics
>a (node & arc) graph based model; a globally interoperable data format.
>There appear to be two major alternatives available for the model/format -
>XML Topic Maps (XTM) and Resource Description Framework (RDF). (I'm
>currently working on a tool of this type primarily using the latter).
>I'm sure that this has already been noted, but just for the record there's
>also the CMapTools tool :
>which is already in very widespread use in schools etc, and from what I
>gather has until recently been using a proprietary format for data
>interchange, but will in the near future use XTM.
>Danny Ayers
>Idea maps for the Semantic Web
><stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff>
>Semantic Web Log :
>http://www.citnames.com/blog    (03)

XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.    (04)

http://www.nexist.org/wiki/User0Blog    (05)