From: Bill Bearden <BBearden@BCL.net>
<massive snippage>
> This led me to an article discussing the philosophical infrastructure of
KM
> (http://www.brint.com/km/km.htm). The author, Yogesh Malhotra, contends
that
> Lockean (consensual) and Leibnizian (closed) inquiry systems are less well
> suited for KM than Kantian (multiple complementary views) and Hegelian
> (multiple antithetical views) inquiry systems.
Which lead me to do a google on Churchman (Malhotra wants you to write to
him for a list of references). I found this page:
http://iops.tamu.edu/faculty/j-courtney/inqorg/inqorg.htm
which is a rather more complete discussion on Churchman's ideas.
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/444287/_/961452940/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 19 2000 - 15:24:14 PDT