Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted
Coolness. (01)
As Lee mentioned as well, there is a sense in which the original
observation
is "old news". But despite the familiarity with the concept, Lee had this
interesting comment to make: (02)
"I think the flaw with Groves and NODAL as a candidate data model
for the OHS is that they are too document-centric -- NODAL less so
than Groves. They express a data model for a document, but depend
on something external to relate data between documents. (03)
"The point I try to get across in my paper is that there is no need
for such a distinction... (04)
This sounds to me like a breakthrough in modeling that will be a
fundamental
change/addition to the way NODAL or Groves is described and understood. (05)
Even though they are, at bottom, a collection of nodes, the models are
still
rather document-centric, according to Eugene. It would seem that good
things
happen when the model is improved. It will be nice to understand what,
when, and how.
:_) (06)